implications of CO2 fraud


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ KillCarb Forum ]

Posted by Larry on November 28, 2011 at 09:03:00


Now that AB32 is heating up, is anyone challenging AB32 because it is based on fraud? Most people know that the historical data supporting global warming was a scam. Fewer know that the science of was scammed as well. I'm an engineer and did a detailed analysis of the effects of doubling CO2 in the earth's atmosphere. Definitely NOT catastrophic global warming. The effects of atmospheric CO2 published by the IPCC and adopted by the EPA were exaggerated 6 to 10 times. What can I do with my analysis to help kill this regulatory power grab? It doesn't take $4B per year to analyze and validate the earth's radiation budget.


Follow Ups: